2014年4月27日星期日

Collaborative project-based learning and problem-based learning in higher education——Virtual-based learning

Collaborative project-based learning and problem-based learning in higher education

---Virtual-based learning

1. What is virtual team learning? 

Virtual team learning that takes place within the distance learning environment goes further in educating students for work in the 21st century. Virtual teams are teams that do not meet face-to-face and use computer-mediated communication. Virtual-based learning is always based on the Internet or the IT technology. Students can be attending the same university from different geographical locations or be involved in multi-university projects. Students work with students from different cultures and backgrounds to achieve a common goal or accomplish a specific task. In most cases, the students have not known each other previously. So the virtual-based learning is a new product of new era.

2. Three kinds of shifts (Three cases and the analysis)

Case 1: (Mastery LearningInquiry Learning)


This case is from my own experience of my college life. There was a course named “Principle of Microcomputer”, at the end of this course at that semester, it required us to project a program, which can be input into computers to realize the working process of traffic lights. At the beginning of the course, there were several programs as models for every student to learn and imitate, all of those programs were the basis, which concluded almost all the knowledge about “Principle of Microcomputer”. After being familiar with all these basic knowledge, it required us to use the knowledge to realize a complex project, which was the final goal of this course.

I remember that the professor said to us, “It is easy to master the models, but that will not be challenged, what I want is all of you can think deeply about the basic ones and then create really useful one.”

After receiving the assignment, the students went back and did some deep researches about the project. We had to inquire the specific meaning of the traffic lights, and designed the program, which can be input into the computers to debug, and saw the wither the outcome be appropriate or not. We used the university online system to do the job and contacted with our professor. With lots of attempts, we got it.

Analysis 1:

In this case, the most important difference from traditional education is that, it is not just focused on the degree of mastery learning, but paying more attention to the inquiry learning. And I think that this project is an assignment, which combined traditional learning and virtual-based learning, students are required to attend the necessary lessons to study the basic theories, and then they have to use the basic theories to research the deeper problem. During the process of doing the program, on the one hand, all the students need to use the traditional education style to get the traditional knowledge, on the other hand, they have to use the technology to realize the PC languages on the computers, and then put them into practice.

From my perspective, mastery learning is important, it reflects the degree of knowledge mastered by people, which can show some problems. But the inquiry learning focuses more, the traditional examination is to test students whether they can fill in all the blanks of the contents, while inquiry learning requires students to do more flexible researches and attempts to get the complex outcomes. The outcomes are always more meaningful, but the most important and meaningful is the process to reach the outcomes. Basically, the process of inquiry concludes much, there will be many difficulties and barriers come out when you do the task, and the process of overcoming those difficulties is also the process of improving yourself, and achieving more about the task. Overall, we can see that inquiry learning is a more advanced learning style to get more meaningful results, and the process of researching can be supported by the new technology, such as the continuously debugging the program in the case. So this kind of virtual-based learning is an excellent method.

Case 2: (One shot LearningLong term Learning)

This case is about Maritime students’ online collaborative learning in virtual teams.

Maritime students who are in their second year and who have successfully completed all required courses in the first three semesters are required to take up the 3-unit course - Maritime Research. Students attend their regular classes but do their research work online collaboratively. The online learning approach is used to provide students with enough time to carry out research activities.

The structure of the virtual team is special in this study. The students were grouped according to their research interest. The virtual encounter happened either through Facebook, e-mail, Yahoo Messenger, or Skype. The teams were provided with addresses for each of these online channels. There were approximately five groups in each research class.

The group leader took the group members' comments, suggestions, output, questions, data, documents, etc. The leader reported to the professor and waited for the next learning instruction or requirement to finish. The team members were encouraged and required to contribute to the whole team. If there was a need for any group member to inquire directly to the professor, the member was permitted.

To illustrate, team members decided to study about the effects of the oil spill in Guimaras. As a group, they developed strategies on how to carry out their research work. The strategies were then submitted to the professor as scheduled. The students were asked to state any challenges they had during the process. These data were collected for analysis by the professor.
(MA. CECILIA D. ALIMEN & ROLANDO A. ALIMEN)

Analysis 2:

From this case, we can see another application of virtual team learning, the students finished their required work online. There might be a doubt about virtual-based learning that whether virtual team learning can do work on long-term studying or just for one shot studying. And now, we can conclude without hesitation that it can reach long term learning in education. In the case, the students attend their regular classes but collaboratively do their research work online, and this study last three semesters. So from my perspective, what the students have finished is not just an one shot learning. Basically, the virtual team learning in the case should be recognized as a process, all the actions in the study including the collaboration are not overnight. Unlike the one shot learning, which just focuses on a short-term goal, and the team might be the short-term or the temporary one. There were 3-unit courses in this case, and according to the information of the research, all the members could have enough time to think about their work and finished it collaboratively but not just individually.

Above all, we can see that the collaboration in throughout the whole process, and the virtual team learning online was going on in order.
Firstly, there was a specific goal at the beginning, and all the students were required to form several groups as what should be done in the real teams, collaboration is also used in the virtual team learning.
Secondly, there were different kinds of channels to be supplied for the students, they could use them to find their own-interested research and their final teams. It was convenient and flexible about the learning, in my opinion, the students are encouraged to think by themselves at the beginning the direction, but not be distributed the assignments by the professors. And after determining the research which they did preferred, working with the teammates who have the same interests, which can increase the effectiveness and make the whole collaboration enduring.
Thirdly, there was a leader in every team, just like in the real teams. The virtual leaders were the bridges to linking teammates and professors, and I think the difference between the virtual teams and real teams was that it would be more efficient and convenient for the leaders to finish their jobs.
And at last, the outcomes from every virtual teams should be submitted to the professors, and it would have the standards to evaluate the assignments and also the deadlines. After assessing the case as a whole, we can conclude that students who did the work in virtual teams can be a successful process, it also can reach the long-term objectives, and even more effective and efficient. The virtual-based learning can be used in such kind of cases, and that will be a big deal in education. Virtual team learning can be a fantastic idea to be developed at least.

Case 3: (Lessons LearningExperiential Learning)

This is about a kind of virtual team online learning portal—Blackboard.

The virtual team environment was created through the Blackboard online learning portal. The Blackboard environment was created specifically to allow online team members to work on their virtual team tasks collaboratively. The teams were all provided with an online discussion board accessed by a unique identity code. Groups of five to six students were randomly distributed to a group (e.g., Lion or Platypus) and each group was required to complete series of team assignments over the semester. For example, on one of the online team assignments, team members were asked to watch a video which depicted selected workplace communication problems. Students were asked to identify the problems and then as a group to develop an intervention plan to solve the problems. Group size was deliberately kept small because studies have found that dilution effect (i.e., the larger the group size, the less motivated group members are in contributing to the group effort) are more pronounced in larger groups (Brewer, 2005; Karau & Williams, 1993; Kidewell & Bennett, 1993; Latane, 1981).

Group members were randomly assigned to play different roles in their group by the unit coordinator. For example, group members who were assigned the “Contributor” role were expected to kick start the online discussion and to provide a discussion of what they think the problem and solution might be. Group members who were assigned the role of the “Critic” are required to stimulate the discussion with a critical analysis of the problem under investigation. They might suggest alternative points and communicate with other members as to why they think they have the better solution. Finally, students assigned the “Summariser” role were expected to sum up the group discussion making sure that the group has reached an agreed position in relation to an identified workgroup conflict and a proposed solution for the problem. And then students were required to post their answers online for grading and for online feedback. In addition, all teams had access to different course documents, an online discussion board monitored by the unit coordinator, online files and documents exchange, online announcement, and the online grade book.

Students were also expected to write a required intervention plan based on a real world problem they identified with their group members. For example, group members were required to negotiate and identify a workplace problem encountered by one of their group members in real life. Then as a group, they had to develop an intervention plan to help solve the problem. A group based intervention plan was then submitted to the unit coordinator at the end of the semester. Additionally, students were asked to specifically state any positive and/or negative challenges they encountered in their virtual teams. These data were collected for further analysis by the unit coordinator.
(Jennifer Loh)

Analysis 3:

In this case, we can see the big difference and transformation between traditional education and the new one.

During our many years studying, most of us received “lessons” by teachers, we just had lectures at class, the teachers taught us the knowledge, and there were several interactions during lectures, but not many. Basically, the learning condition is that teachers were saying and students were listening, students should finish their individual homework after class, and handed in next day. This kind of education has its own advantages, such as the its order, the clear direction of learning from teachers and so on. But the most important disadvantage is lacking of practice and collaboration. Students just learned by themselves most time, who had little communication with each other about the assignments, and what they did are main the theories, but not experiential practices.
 And now, the world is different, everything is changing and developing, so does the education style and method, and virtual team learning is a new way and effective way for students in high-education. We can see that the students are using a new technology on the internet to go on their studying through the portal named Blackboard in this case. This Blackboard is not the blackboard we ever seen before. We can write things with chalk on the traditional blackboard, and this new Blackboard is a portal online, which can transform knowledge on the Internet, this is a virtual blackboard, but can realize the real things. And this learning way is one kind of virtual team learning.

The virtual team learning realizes many targets, firstly, the students shape different teams online, and because of the different people from different placesthe teams are named virtual teams, this is a collaboration studying, all the members can communicate with each other on the platform of Internet, the biggest difference is this kind of team is virtual, but not the entity.
Secondly, however this collaboration online is different from the traditional teamwork, but it makes learning even more effective and convenient. They can share information together, such us watching video together mentioned in the case, and also they can search materials directly online, and then share with others.
Thirdly, this is virtual team, but it solve the real things, we can see the intervention plan in the case, which is a real method or channel to let everyone discus the real problems in their real lives, just resolve them through the virtual way.

3. Global context influence on the virtual-based learning and the future trend.

With the development of modern society, everything is changing, everything is moving on. The world is big to human before, but now, the world is becoming more and more “smaller” because of the fast-developing technology. Especially among the IT area, Internet has the close connection to our life. Nowadays, we can use computers to surf the Internet, and we also can use Ipad or Iphone. It is no exaggeration to say that almost everything is becoming intelligent and digital. The development of society is not just a tendency, it is advancing really. Under the big condition, as a very important part of the society, education has to be developed, not only to its content, but also the mode. So change is necessary. I always think that everything is changing everyday, and changing means challenging, but challenging can bring about chances, and then something new will and must appear. Virtual-based learning is a new product, which is to match the new need for the new style education. Thinking about my learning career, what education I received was most the traditional and old-fashioned. To simplify the process of the learning, which might just is giving knowledge from teachers, then doing assignments individually of students, and then having examinations, and to the last attending the lectures again, that was a cycle about the education received by us students. Even though there should be its own order, but it is a little bit too old to the new rhythm of this modern society, and we can see that it was lack of communication and interaction between students and teachers. Even there could be real teams formed to resolve group problems, but there will be much obstruction in front of the traditional teams.

There is an experience of myself in CityU. One of my friends selected a course, which required he finish a task with different people from different universities, all these students are from different places, and it is impossible to let them get together around one table to discuss the topic. For this condition, the traditional teams could not help anymore, but virtual teams do. All the teammates can share ideas with each other through Internet. Even they should overcome difficulties of timetable, but it does not need everybody to fly to one place, and after several-minutes discussion, they need to fly back, which cost time and money. And virtual team learning can make all these situations easy, you can stay at the computer with a cup of coffee, just take it easy. So there is a virtual platform online, but can realize the functions, which cannot appear on real platforms. Actually, not only for education, but also many areas of enterprises, there had been appeared virtual team learning, such as the telephone-meeting and video-interviewing. Basically, it is needed that something new should be come out to match the new times, and virtual-based learning is a fantastic direction.

But what about the future of virtual-based learning? Here are some ideas of myself. Firstly, just as what I mentioned before, it is a developing society, everything is changing, and as we can see the real conditions about the using of virtual-based learning, this new kind of educational learning channel or method has entered into lots of fields. Even we may cannot say that it is very popular, but we can see the virtual team learning is penetrating into our lives. For example, I have been here for further studying at CityU for almost one year, and I use Blackboard to get know documents, and there are virtual discussion board online, we can post our ideas and opinions on it, everybody can share different resources, the professors also will give us replies, all of which consists a learning process, and this is a virtual-based process. So, according to the nice effective outcomes of virtual-based learning, I think it will be put into use more. Who will not like the good things?
Secondly, I have a big expectation about virtual-based learning, and I think that should be supported by higher technology. Nowadays, we have experienced or known the utilization of virtual-based learning, such as the telephone-interview, the assignments through Internet, and a lots of adults education, which having lessons mostly online. There is a problem that even it is useful to use virtual-based learning to realize real problems, but the feeling of real experience of individuals can be very actual, comfortable or not? Let’s choose a real situation about virtual-based learning, for instance, we can have lectures at home through Internet, it is really helpful to deal with the problems about timetable and places, and also reduce the cost of traveling fee, if we think more about it, learning online can save the cost of accommodation. But to the learning itself, when we are experiencing the virtual learning, how real feelings can we get or what the experience quality? For another word, we can use e-books to substitute the traditional reading habit, but can we get the feeling of reading a book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, and smell the unique taste from the real books when you just use an Ipad to read? So how to make the virtual learning more and more real is a big deal, and this should be a very interesting and meaningful direction of development about virtual-based learning.

Thinking about a scenario, if it is time for studying, then I enter into a high-tech room with omni-directional stereo environment, and when you start to have lessons, you can feel that you are in a real classroom, it was like to touch the professor and classmates when you fingering out. If this can be realized, it must be cool. Someone may think that what I said is Arabian Nights, but can you imagine there would be planes come out 5000 years ago? And the level of technology is becoming more and more higher, it is possible that virtual-based learning can be really “real”. 

4. References:

1] Mary Z. Last, Virtual Teams in Computing Education, by Kingston University, UK, December 1999.

2] Jennifer Loh, Understanding Students’ Online Learning Experiences in Virtual Teams, School of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social Sciences, The University of New England, Australia, Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2010.

3] MA. CECILIA D. ALIMEN, ROLANDO A. ALIEN, Maritime Students’ Online Collaborative Learning in Virtual Teams: A Research Teaching Experience, John B. Lacson Foundation Maritime University, Iloilo City, Philippines, Vol. 8 No.1 December 2012.

4] Charles Wankel, Jan Kingsley, Higher Education in VIRTUAL WORLDS Teaching and learning in Second life, UK, 2009.

5] Ed Catmull, How Pixar Fosters Collective creativity, Harvard Business Review, September 2008.

6] Bill Fischer & Andy Boynton, VIRTUOSO TEAMS, Harvard Business Review, July-August 2005.

7] Lynda Gratton & Tamara J. Erickson, Ways to Build Collaborative Teams, Harvard Business Review, November 2007.

8] Diana McLain Smith, How to manage relationship conflict, Rotman Magazine Fail 2008.

9] Leigh L. Thompson, The mind and heart of the negotiator, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.


10] KANDARP MEHTA, Five Essential Strategies for Creative Negotiations, FOURTH QUARTER 2012 ISSUE 15.

2014年1月26日星期日

Individual Assignment 1: To Trust or to distrust


About four years ago, after my college entrance examination, there was a very important thing in front of me to be determined, which is to choose what kind of university to enter in and which program can be selected. To tell the truth, as a high-school student at that time, I had not thought about what I want to do after my graduation from the high school clearly, so I just went to find help from elders. To the elders, the standards to make the decision maybe that how famous the university is or how hot the program is. Actually, four years ago, the field of State Grid had an outstanding future, and according to a friend of my father, who was charged for the area of electrical power system, he suggested me that I could select a program relative to electric, and after the graduation, I could have the big opportunity to enter into the State Grid system, which is fantastic. At last, I made my decision to trust him, and selected the program Electrical Power Engineering in NJIT. But two years later, State Grid did the system reform, and its foreground was not as good as before. At the same time, the staff’s children had more chances than me. All these situations made me awkward and confused, and also I didn’t like what I learnt. And I didn’t enter into the field.
Four years on, I think there are many reasons why I made the decision to trust the man. Firstly, at that time, I had less experience than the elders, I did not have the clear ideal about my preference, so I give up the chance to think and choose by myself. Secondly, four years ago, State Grid was a very nice platform, which is hot. If I had an opportunity to work there, that was a great choice. Thirdly, the man who gave me the advice is a great person, he was charged for the system in my hometown, on the one hand, he had plenty of knowledge and information about the State Grid, on the other hand, he had the power and right to help me enter into the system. According to the article “The decision to trust” by Robert F.Hurley (2006), there are two kinds of factors about the process to trust or distrust, decision-maker factors and situational factors, which conclude risk tolerance, level of adjustment, relative power, security, number of similarities, alignment of interests, benevolent concern, capability, predictability and integrity, level of communication. Now we can see that, even though I did not know the model of decision to trust four years ago, but the reasons why I chose to trust the man were followed by the model.
To think more about my instance, the result of my decision maybe not as good as expected. Because of some uncertainties and not plenty of deep thought, I spent four years learning what I disliked. According to Robert (2006), if the factor is low, we should find some ways to make it more clearly. For example, the risk tolerance is low, we should spend more time explaining options and risks, to my condition, at that timewhat I should do is to consider more about the selections and the risks of just choosing State Grid. We can also learn from the instance, there can be many uncertainties in the society, today is good, but what about tomorrow? And sometimes we have to rethink trust (Roderick M.Kramer), and know what the real things you want to yourself, but not just trust others without any your own thoughts.
By the way, after my graduation from NJIT, I made another decision that come to HongKong for further study, and this time, someone gave me the advice to Cityu, I thought a lot, and chose to trust him myself, so know I’m here. What about this trust? Let’s wait and see.


References:


[1] Robert F. Hurley (2006). The Decision to Trust. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW.September 2006:55-62

[2] Roderick M. Kramer(2009). Rethinking Trust. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW. June 2009:69-77